- The woodcut on page 22 shows Guomindang officers taking animals and food from a house. The miserable appearances of the family in the house suggests that life under Chiang Kaishek's regime would be terrible. This would make becoming a communist much more appealing to the Chinese people; people who were aware of the communists' ideology might have believed that such things would never happen in a communist country, where everybody would work together and share their food and animals with each other.
- The Chinese Communist Party poster on page 23 shows the communists ideology of peasants working together collectively, an image which may have gained the support of China's peasant population. It also shows that the goal of this cooperation was to assist the Red Army in resisting against the Japanese invasion. The communists may have been taking advantage of the unpopular decision of Chiang Kaishek to refuse to open a united front against Japan and instead focus on eliminating the communists.
- Source A in the book is a statement made by Chiang Kaishek about the state of the Guomindang. Chiang Kaishek seems to be trying to understand and explain why his organization was failing against the communists. This is valuable in that it is a primary source and it reveals some of the Guomindang's ideology, stating that people should know have spirit and discipline, caring for more than just themselves. Chiang Kaishek seems to believe that the lack of these qualities in the Guomindang was helping the communists win. However, it does not give any specific examples of what "right and wrong" are, and very little context is given to the source. Meanwhile, the excerpt from Mao: The Unknown Story was written by a historian many years after the communists won the Chinese Civil War, with the purpose of teaching what the author saw as the true reason for the communist victory. This is valuable because Jung Chang writes very different interpretations of why the communists won, saying that it was mostly due to foreign aid and the use of fear. Some claims, however, are not supported with any significant evidence.
Friday, February 12, 2010
In Class Work 2/12
Monday, February 8, 2010
HW 3
Why did the Communists, and not the Nationalists, win the Chinese Civil War?
- Communists gained the support of the peasants through land reform (land was given to peasants), propaganda (Long March, images portraying Nationalists negatively and emphasizing the Communists' will to cooperate with each other), and the formation of the Jiangxi Soviet.
- The use of guerrilla warfare kept the Red Army together as a fighting force- the Long March allowed the Communists to regroup, bringing their numbers to about 80,000
- Mistakes by the Nationalists + Chiang Kaishek- Failure of the Extermination Campaigns, Loss of US support by 1949, Failure to gain support of the peasants, Refusal to resist against the Japanese invasion (makes him look bad, opposition takes advantage of this with propaganda, causes him to lose support), Cooperation with northern warlords
- Support of the USSR- spies, leadership/advisors
- Mao called for a "United Front" against Japan
Friday, February 5, 2010
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Class Work 2/4
A.
- Between Jiangxi and Zunyi, the communists marched along a very straightforward route.
- After Zunyi, the communists took a much less direct path, dividing the Red Army at some points and making full circles around certain areas before moving forward.
- Chiang Kaishek and the Guomindang was able to predict the communists' movements and interrupt them when they were marching in straight lines. The communists changed their movements so that they would not be caught so easily.
- The Red Army may have been trapped and defeated by the Guomindang if they had not changed their tactics.
- Source A is supported by the fact that less than a quarter of the 87,000 communists who started the Long March finished it. However, the fact that any of them made it to Shaanxi makes the Long March a success for communists to some extent. The countless obstacles that the communists had to overcome, particularly the crossing of the Dadu river, proved the determination of the communists, supporting the claim made in Source B. However, Chiang Kaishek was very successful in reducing the numbers of the communists, even if he did not exterminate them completely.
- I think that the first view is much more accurate. Many communists were lost in the Long March, but as the source says, it was not a decisive defeat; the communists eventually won the civil war and gained dominance over China, despite the great losses after 1928.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Class Notes 2/3/10
Communists worked to gain the support of peasants:
- Land reform
- Ended arranged marriages
- Ended foot binding
- Lowered rents
- Peasant associations
- Propaganda (everybody has a job and is treated equally)
- Class warfare
- Compare to Soviets purging the kulaks (wealthy land owning peasants)
- Jianxi Soviet (1930s)
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
HW 2
Air:
- Airlift (after WWII) - Americans brought 80,000 Nationalist troops to Nanjing, Shanghai, and Beijing to prevent Communists from gaining any more land
- Bomber Aircraft used against communists in extermination campaign
- Guerrilla Warfare - In 1934, Mao led communists on the "Long March," a movement that allowed them to avoid the nationalists and unite the Red Army in Shaanxi
- Nationalist troops chased communists throughout the Long March
- Communists took over railways, shipping, mining, forestry, agriculture, led night raids on nationalists
- Tanks/armored cars used against communists in extermination campaign
- March starts October 1934 with 87,000 communist troops
- Communists are losing, about to be defeated
- Otto Braun's conventional tactics (fighting face-to-face, no guerrilla warfare) are questioned
- Mao replaces Braun, resumes guerrilla tactics
- March ends October 1935 with fewer than 10,000 communist troops
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)